直缝焊接钢管与混凝土界面黏结性能试验研究

罗佩云; 雷永旺; 朱彬荣; 赵卫平

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG20052008

直缝焊接钢管与混凝土界面黏结性能试验研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052008

1. 烟台职业学院建筑工程系, 山东烟台 264670;
2. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院, 北京 100083;
3. 中国电力科学研究院有限公司, 北京 100192

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（51474218）；教育部中央高校基本科研业务费（2021YQLJ06）。

详细信息

作者简介:
罗佩云,女,1979年出生,硕士研究生,讲师。电子信箱:lpy0902@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 76
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 3
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-05-20
- 网络出版日期: 2021-07-17

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON INTERFACE BOND PERFORMANCES BETWEEN LSAW STEEL PIPES AND CONCRETE

1. Department of Architecture Engineering, Yantai Vocational College, Yantai 264670, China;
2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
3. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China

摘要

摘要: 大跨越输电杆塔工程中钢管混凝土结构设计对其界面黏结性能提出了更高的要求。为研究直缝焊接钢管与混凝土界面黏结性能，采用正交试验方法设计了9个钢管混凝土试件的推出试验。研究了直缝焊接钢管与混凝土界面黏结机理和黏结应力分布规律，分析了各因素影响黏结强度的主次关系及变化规律，并基于正交试验分析结果提出了优化的黏结强度经验计算式。试验结果表明：黏结应力-滑移曲线包括胶结段、非线性初滑移段和滑移段，在胶结段、非线性初滑移段曲线呈相似上升趋势，在滑移段曲线出现3种发展趋势，即Ⅰ-1、Ⅰ-2和Ⅱ类；Ⅰ-1类曲线下降后保持水平，Ⅰ-2类曲线下降后呈二次上升，Ⅱ类曲线形成拐点后缓慢上升，其3种发展趋势主要由直缝焊接钢管的制作"宏观偏差"所导致；影响胶结强度和极限黏结强度的因素主次关系均为钢管径厚比、混凝土强度、界面黏结长度，胶结强度和极限黏结强度随钢管径厚比增大而显著降低，随混凝土强度提高而增大；试件两端处黏结应力存在随荷载增大而减小的现象，揭示了黏结界面剥离从两端向中部发展的破坏机制；与其他学者实测数据对比证明本文黏结强度计算式有一定的可参考性。
- 直缝焊接钢管 /
- 黏结性能 /
- 推出试验 /
- 黏结应力-滑移曲线 /
- 黏结强度
Abstract: In structure design of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) structure of long-span transmission towers, the higher requirements were put forward for the interface bond performance. To study the interface bond performances between LSAW(longitudinally Submerged Arc Welding) steel pipes and concrete, push-out tests based on orthogonal test principles were conducted on nine CFST specimens. The bond mechanisms and distribution laws of bond stress between LSAW steel pipes and concrete were studied. The main and secondary relations and influencing laws of parameters on the bond strength were analyzed. The optimized empirical formulas of bond strength were proposed based on the analysis of orthogonal tests. Test results indicated that curves of bond stress and slip consisted of the adhesive stage, nonlinear initial sliding stage and sliding stage. All curves had a similar rising tendency at the adhesive stage and nonlinear initial sliding stage. And there were three kinds of tendencies at sliding stage, namely, type I-1, Ⅰ-2 and Ⅱ. The type I-1 curve firstly decreased and then kept it stable. The type Ⅰ-2 curve firstly decreased and then possessed a secondary rising branch. The type II curve continued to ascend slowly at the sliding stage. Three kinds of curve tendencies were mainly caused by macro-manufacturing deviations of the LSAW steel pipes. The factors that influenced adhesive strength and ultimate bond strength both were in order of diameter-thickness ratio of steel pipes, concrete strength and interface bond length in terms of importance. The adhesive strength and ultimate bond strength bothdecreased significantly with the increase of diameter-thickness ratios of steel pipes, but increased with the increase of concrete strength. The bond stress at two ends of specimens decreased with the increase of loads, which revealed the failure mechanism that interface peeled off from the both ends to the middle part. A comparison with other literatures verified that the optimized calculation formulas of bond strength had reliability.
- LSAW steel pipe /
- bond performance /
- push-out test /
- bond stress-slip curve /
- bond strength

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.

朱瑞元, 李喜来, 廖宗高, 等. 大跨越钢管混凝土输电塔抗震性能分析[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2018(增刊2):136-144.

朱天浩, 徐建国, 叶尹, 等. 输电线路特大跨越设计中的关键技术[J]. 电力建设, 2010, 31(4):25-31.

CHEN Y, FENG R, SHAO Y B, et al. Bond-Slip Behaviour of Concrete-Filled Stainless Steel Circular Hollow Section Tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 130:248-263.

许开成, 黄财林, 陈梦成. 钢管内壁粗糙程度对钢管混凝土界面黏结性能的影响研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(增刊1):420-424.

TAO Z, SONG T Y, BRIAN U, et al. Bond Behaviour in Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 120:81-93.

黄文金, 盛叶, 张正宾, 等. 钢管-钢纤维活性粉末混凝土界面黏结强度试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(增刊1):502-507,514.

VIRDI K S, DOWLING P J. Bond Structure in Concrete Filled Steel Tubes[C]//IABSE. IABSE Proceeding. Zurich:IABSE,1980:125-139.

SHAKIR-KHALIL H. Push-Out Strength of Concrete-Filled Steel Hollow Sections[J]. Structure Engineer, 1993, 71(13):230-243.

ROEDER C W, CAMERON B, BROWN C B. Composite Action in Concrete Filled Tubes[J]. The Structural Engineer,1999, 125(5):477-484.

薛立红, 蔡绍怀. 钢管混凝土柱组合界面的黏结强度(上)[J]. 建筑科学, 1996(3):22-28.

薛立红, 蔡绍怀. 钢管混凝土抗剪连接件的试验研究[J]. 建筑科学, 1998(1):13-21.

陈宗平, 徐金俊, 薛建阳, 等. 钢管再生混凝土黏结滑移推出试验及黏结强度计算[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(3):49-58.

马吉昌, 荆松龙, 李云龙. 非生产因素对埋弧焊管椭圆度的影响[J]. 焊管, 2012, 35(7):48-52.

中国电力企业联合会. 输电线路钢管塔用直缝焊管:T/CEC 136-2017[S]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2017.

TAO Z, HAN L H, BRIAN U, et al. Post-Fire Bond Between the Steel Tube and Concrete in Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(3):484-496.

薛立红, 蔡绍怀. 钢管混凝土柱组合界面的黏结强度(下)[J]. 建筑科学, 1996, 12(4):19-23.

康希良. 钢管混凝土组合力学性能及黏结滑移性能研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2008.

孙威, 付腾燕, 居理宏, 等. 阵列型金属阻尼器钢棒耗能元件设计与性能研究[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2018, 35(5):225-232.

许开成, 毕丽苹, 陈梦成. 钢管混凝土界面黏结应力-滑移本构关系试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(增刊1):407-412.

刘永健,池建军.钢管混凝土界面抗剪粘结强度的推出试验[J]. 工业建筑, 2006,36(4):78-80.

刘永健, 刘君平, 池建军. 钢管混凝土界面抗剪粘结滑移力学性能试验[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 35(1):17-23,29.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	宋树祥，李耀晃，黄秋凤，苏智良，王杰. 大型垃圾填埋场垃圾挡坝拓建三维有限元数值模拟研究. 广东土木与建筑. 2023(05): 28-31 . 百度学术
2.	刘炜奇，温树杰，刘浚基，景彬余. 土工格栅加筋边坡最小势能稳定性分析方法. 公路工程. 2022(03): 76-81 . 百度学术