RESEARCH ON COUPLED AND COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA'S CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND REGIONAL ECONOMY
-
摘要: 在构建建筑业与区域经济耦合协调评价指标体系的基础上,以我国各省份为研究单元,运用熵值法、耦合协调度模型定量测算我国各省建筑业与区域经济间的耦合协调度,并结合ArcGIS 10.5对我国各省建筑业与区域经济间的耦合协调发展水平及时空分布规律进行分析。研究表明:2011—2017年间,我国建筑业与区域经济耦合协调总体上可划分为3大类型,区域间差异显著,区域经济发展滞后型省份数量较多。建筑业综合发展水平和区域经济发展水平省间发展不均衡,区域极化效应明显,总体上呈现出沿海省份高于内陆省份的空间格局特征;建筑业与区域经济耦合度省间存在一定差异,处于"多极"向"面状"发展阶段,辐射带动作用明显。整体上,建筑业与区域经济间的耦合协调度处于中级协调水平,总体协同发展效应有增强趋势,空间分布未发生明显变化。Abstract: On the basis of constructing an evaluation index system for the coupling and coordination of the construction industry and the regional economy, taking various province in China as the research unit, the entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model were used to quantitatively measure the coupling and coordination degree between the construction industry and the regional economy in China, and combined with ArcGIS10.5 to analyze the coordinated and coordinated development level and time-space distribution law of the construction industry and regional economy in various provinces in China. The research showed that:from 2011 to 2017, the coupling and coordination of the construction industry and regional economy in China could be generally divided into three types, with significant differences between regions, and there were more provinces with lagging regional economic development. The comprehensive development level of the construction industry and the level of regional economic development were unbalanced among these provinces, and the regional polarization effect was obvious. In general, the spatial pattern of coastal provinces was higher than that of inland provinces; there was a certain degree of differences between the construction industry and regional economy. The differences were in the stage of development from "multi-polarity" to"planar", and the radiating effect was obvious. On the whole, the degree of coupling and coordination between the construction industry and the regional economy was at the intermediate level of coordination, the overall synergistic development effect tended to increase, and the spatial distribution had not changed significantly.
-
[1] 李东红, 仇保兴, 吴志强.中美绿色建筑发展模式及其演进特征的比较研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2017(8):115-124. [2] 刘万红, 周义, 周怡.中部地区省会城市房地产与城市经济系统耦合协调研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(6):699-704. [3] 段婕, 孙明旭.高技术产业、传统产业与区域经济三系统耦合协调度实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(23):54-63. [4] 戴永安, 陈才, 黄馨.区域经济增长与建筑业技术效率耦合的空间差异[J]. 经济地理, 2011, 31(5):766-769. [5] 蔡彬清, 刘元芳.建筑业发展对区域经济增长的影响效应研究:基于中国31省市的面板数据分析[J]. 建筑经济, 2010(9):5-8. [6] 郭湖斌, 齐源.基于耦合模型的长三角区域物流与区域经济协调发展研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2018, 37(10):51-58. [7] 董晓红, 富勇.绿色金融和绿色经济耦合发展空间动态演变分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2018, 37(12):94-101. [8] 杨朝继.生产性服务业与区域经济的协调发展:以中部地区为例[J]. 改革, 2018(6):127-137. [9] 许秀文.文化旅游与城市经济协调发展的内在机制研究[J]. 社会科学家, 2018(8):95-101. [10] 王璐璐, 虞虎, 周彬.浙江省旅游产业与区域经济发展的耦合协调度分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2017, 36(6):87-92. [11] 刘爱芳, 任晓宇, 郭树荣.建筑业可持续发展评价指标及方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2011(13):166-168. [12] 张磊.我国建筑业可持续发展水平评价分析:基于投影寻踪原理[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2011(11):105-108. [13] 杨芳.建筑业可持续发展评价方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2009. [14] 李裕瑞, 王婧, 刘彦随, 等.中国"四化"协调发展的区域格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(2):199-212. [15] 梁留科, 王伟, 李峰, 等.河南省城市化与旅游产业耦合协调度时空变化研究[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(1):1-8.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 157
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0