玻璃纤维复材筋与玄武岩纤维复材布约束混凝土黏结性能试验研究

王言磊; 王密锋; 张学; 许清风

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz202003028

玻璃纤维复材筋与玄武岩纤维复材布约束混凝土黏结性能试验研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202003028

1. 大连理工大学土木工程学院, 辽宁大连 116024;
2. 上海市建筑科学研究院上海市工程结构安全重点实验室, 上海 200032

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0703000）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（51778102，51978126）；中央高校基本科研业务费项目（DUT18LK35）；辽宁省自然科学基金项目（20180550763）；上海市工程结构安全重点实验室开放课题（2018-KF04，2019-KF03）。

详细信息

作者简介:
王言磊,男,1978年出生,博士,副教授,博士生导师。电子信箱:wangyanlei@dlut.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 75
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-21

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE BOND BEHAVIOR OF GFRP BARS IN BFRP-CONFINED CONCRETE

1. School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety, SRIBS, Shanghai 200032, China

摘要

摘要: 通过对36个拉拔试件进行试验，对玻璃纤维复材（GFRP）筋与玄武岩纤维复材（BFRP）侧向约束混凝土的黏结性能进行研究。试验变量包括4种BFRP侧向约束层数（0，1，2，3层）和3种混凝土强度（40.6，44.2，52.7 MPa）。试验结果表明：BFRP侧向约束混凝土可使拉拔试件的破坏模式由脆性的劈裂破坏转变为延性的拔出破坏；BFRP侧向约束可显著提升GFRP筋与混凝土之间的黏结性能；较于无约束试件，3种混凝土强度下，1层、2层和3层BFRP约束试件的黏结强度分别提高了25%~35%、42%~56%、52%~88%，达到黏结强度时的平均黏结滑移量分别增大了47%~187%、86%~267%、168%~211%；当约束试件的黏结应力大约达到无约束试件的黏结强度时，BFRP外约束才逐渐开始发挥作用，且达到黏结强度时的BFRP径向约束应力基本随着BFRP约束层数和混凝土强度的提高而提高；同一混凝土强度下，约束试件的相对黏结强度随着BFRP约束刚度比的增大而近似呈线性增大。
- 纤维增强复材筋 /
- 黏结性能 /
- 约束混凝土 /
- 黏结-滑移关系 /
- 约束应力
Abstract: The bond behavior of GFRP bar in BFRP-confined concrete was experimentally investigated. 36 specimens were prepared for pull-out test. The test variables included the number of BFRP layers (0, 1, 2 and 3 layers of fiber fabric) and the compressive strength of concrete (40.6, 44.2 and 52.7 MPa). The test results indicated that for BFRP lateral confinement, the typical failure mode of specimens was changed from brittle splitting failure to ductile pull-out failure. The bond behavior between GFRP bars and concrete could be significantly improved due to the lateral confinement from the BFRP jacket. Compared with unconfined specimens, bond strength of confined specimens with one, two and three layers of BFRP increased by 25%~35%, 42%~56% and 52%~88%, respectively, corresponding to three different concrete strengths, and the average bond slip of FRP bars reaching to the bond strength increased by 47%~187%, 86%~267%, 168%~211%, respectively. The confinement from the outer BFRP jacket was activated when the bond stress of confined specimens approximately reached the bond strength of unconfined specimens. The radial confining stress corresponding to bond strength increased with the number of BFRP layers and the concrete strength. Under the same concrete strength conditions, the normalized bond strength of confined specimens approximately linearly increased with the increase of confinement stiffness ratio of BFRP.
- FRP bar /
- bond behavior /
- confined concrete /
- bond stress-slip relationship /
- confining stress

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

刘伟,谢友均,董必钦,等. 海砂特性及海砂混凝土力学性能的研究[J].硅酸盐通报,2014, 33(1):15-22.

赵晖,张亚梅,明静. 海洋环境条件下不同结构区域混凝土耐久性研究[J].工业建筑,2013, 43(7):86-90.

陆中宇,李永超,谢建和. 海水海砂混凝土内玄武岩纤维增强复材筋性能退化研究[J].工业建筑,2019, 49(9):18-21.

李彪,侯慕轶,杨勇新,等. 复材筋珊瑚骨料混凝土梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑,2016, 46(11):181-184.

DONG Z, WU G, ZHAO X, et al. Long-Term Bond Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars Embedded in Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete Under Ocean Environments[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2018, 22(5):04018042.

SALEH N, ASHOUR A, LAM D, et al. Experimental Investigation of Bond Behaviour of Two Common GFRP Bar Types in High-Strength Concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 201:610-622.

HAO Q, WANG Y, ZHANG Z, et al. Bond Strength Improvement of GFRP Rebars with Different Rib Geometries[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Science A, 2007, 8(9):1356-1365.

VELJKOVIC A, CARVELLI V, HAFFKE M M, et al. Concrete Cover Effect on the Bond of GFRP Bar and Concrete Under Static Loading[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2017, 124:40-53.

LEE J Y, KIM T Y, KIM T J, et al. Interfacial Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars in High-Strength Concrete[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2008, 39(2):258-270.

WON J P, PARK C G, KIM H H, et al. Effect of Fibers on the Bonds Between FRP Reinforcing Bars and High-Strength Concrete[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2008, 39(5):747-755.

郝庆多,王言磊,欧进萍. 拉拔条件下GFRP筋与混凝土黏结强度试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008(1):103-111.

HADI M N S, KHAN Q S, SHEIKH M N. Axial and Flexural Behavior of Unreinforced and FRP Bar Reinforced Circular Concrete Filled FRP Tube Columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 122:43-53.

THAMRIN R, KAKU T. Development Length Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beam with CFRP Bars[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures (BBFS). Hong Kong:International Institute for FRP in Construction, 2005:385-392.

薛伟辰,王圆,方志庆. 黏砂变形GFRP筋与约束混凝土之间的黏结性能[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2013, 16(1):6-11.

GAO K, LI Z, ZHANG J, et al. Experimental Research on Bond Behavior Between GFRP Bars and Stirrups-Confined Concrete[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2019, 9(7).DOI: 10.3390/app9071340.

Canadian Standard Association. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code:CSA-S6-14[S]. Toronto:Canadian Standards Association, 2017.

Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials[S]. Tokyo:Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1997.

王静辉,刘清,韩风霞,等. 玄武岩纤维布加固新疆杨木矩形截面长柱偏心受压力学性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(5):85-89.

秦斌. 海水海砂混凝土基本力学性能研究[J]. 混凝土, 2019(2):90-91.

MOHAMMED T U, HAMADA H, YAMAJI T. Performance of Seawater-Mixed Concrete in the Tidal Environment[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(4):593-601.

LAM L, TENG J G. Design-Oriented Stress-Strain Model for FRP-Confined Concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2003, 17(6/7):471-489.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计