基于我国现行规范场地划分标准的中小震地震动峰值加速度衰减关系
doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201401001
-
摘要: 搜集了美国西部近几年的中小地震记录1 321条以及场地钻孔资料,震级范围为M(3.5~6.5),根据钻孔资料将美国西部地震记录,按照我国GB 50011—2010《建筑抗震设计规范》的规定进行场地分类,统计得到了Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类场地的地震动峰值加速度的衰减关系并分析了其特点。通过将Ⅰ类场地地震动峰值加速度的衰减关系与前人研究的基岩场地衰减关系对比,发现Ⅰ类场地得到的水平和竖向PGA衰减曲线与前人研究的基本一致。由此说明只要场地类别一致,使用不同地区同类场地的中小震记录进行地震动参数研究是可行的。结果为我国的中小震峰值加速度估计提供了依据。Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical features and analyze the serologic test results of latent syphilis. Methods The clinical data of 601 patients with latent syphilis who were treated in the sexually transmitted disease centre of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2001 and November 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Of the 601 cases of latent syphilis,there were 174 cases of early latent syphilis(EL),170 cases of late latent syphilis(LL),and 257 cases of unknown latent syphilis. Male to female ratio was 0.74:1(256 males and 345 females,respectively). Patients aged 20-39 years accounted for the largest proportion. Non-marital sexual intercourse was the main route of infection. Forty-six patients (7.65%) were co-infected with other sexually transmitted diseases. A total of 251 cases of latent syphilis (41.76%) were confirmed when the patients were receiving tests for other sexually transmitted diseases or suspected sexually transmitted diseases. Of the 601 patients with EL,LL and unknown latency,the proportion of serum rapid plasma reagin(RPR) titers higher than or equal to 8 were 72.99% (127/174),52.94% (90/170),and 60.31%(155/257),respectively. Compared with the early syphilis,serological negative conversion rate was significantly lower after treatment for l2 months in the early latent syphilis patients (P=0.044). Conclusion Education and awareness raising on syphilis should be strengthened to lower the prevalence of latent syphilis.
-
Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancersFIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2000,70(2):209-262 [2] Oehler MK, Wain GV, Brand A. Gynaecological malignancies in pregnancy: a review[J].Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.2003, 43(6):414-420 [3] Sayedur Rahman M, Al-Sibai MH, Rahman J, et al. Ovarian carcinoma associated with pregnancy. A review of9 cases[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002, 81(3):260-264. [4] Machado F, Vegas C, Leon J, et al. Ovarian cancer during pregnancy: analysis of 15 cases[J].Gynecol Oncol.2007, 105(2):446-450 [5] 付晨薇, 杨佳欣, 刘俊涛, 等. 剖宫产术中附件包块手术病例分析[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2007, 10(5):336-338. [6] Behtash N, Karimi Zarchi M, Modares Gilani M, et al. Ovarian carcinoma associated with pregnancy: a clinicopathologic analysis of 23 cases and review of the literature[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.2008, 8:3- [7] Palmer J, Vatish M, Tidy J. Epithelial ovarian cancer in pregnancy: a review of the literature[J].BJOG.2009, 116(4):480-491 [8] Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant[J].Gynecol Oncol.2006, 101(2):315-321 [9] Modares Gilani M, Karimi Zarchi M, Behtash N, et al. Preservation of pregnancy in a patient with advanced ovarian caner at 20 weeks of gestation: case report and literature review[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer.2007, 17(5):1140-1143 [10] Zemlickis D, Lishner M, Degendorfer P, et al. Fetal outcome after in utero exposure to cancer chemotherapy[J].Arch Intern Med.1992, 152(3):573-576 [11] Kwon YS, Mok JE, Lim KT, et al. Ovarian cancer during pregnancy: clinical and pregnancy outcome[J].J Korean Med Sci.2010, 25(2):230-234 [12] Jameel A, Jamil SN. Safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy during pregnancy[J]. J pak Med Assoc, 2007, 57(9):449-452. [13] Ishioka S, Hayashi T, Endo T, et al. Advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma during pregnancy[J].Int J Clin Oncol.2007, 12(2):375-378
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 89
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 86
- 被引次数: 0