三种弹塑性本构模型预测路基变形的对比研究

刘兴华; 张飚; 杨松; 高彦斌

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201307018

三种弹塑性本构模型预测路基变形的对比研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307018

刘兴华^1,2,
张飚^1,2,
杨松^1,2,
高彦斌³

1.
1. 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司,北京100088;
2.
2. 中国京冶工程技术有限公司,北京100088;
3.
3. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海200092

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(40702051,50678130)

详细信息

作者简介:
第一作者：刘兴华, 男, 1982年出生, 硕士, 工程师。电子信箱：tjliuxh@163.com

中图分类号: U416.1;U213.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 99
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 68
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-11-25
- 刊出日期: 2013-07-20

EVALUATION OF THREE ELASTO-PLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE MODELS BY NUMERICAL MODELING OF SOIL EMBANKMENTS

1.
1. Central Research Institute of Building and Construction.MCC,Beijing 100088,China;
2.
2. China Jingye Engineering Corporation Limited,Beijing 100088,China;
3.
3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China

摘要

摘要: 采用三种弹塑性模型剑桥模型(MCC)、三维修正剑桥模型(3DMCC)和考虑各向异性的三维修正剑桥模型(ANIS-MCC)，对一假想路堤进行快速加载下的固结变形有限元分析，以考察这三种模型预测结果的区别，为路基变形有限元分析时的本构模型的选取提供依据。研究结果表明，在路基未达到破坏状态以前，三种模型给出的路基变形、孔压消散的规律性基本一致；但当研究分析需要特别提高坡脚位置处地基变形预测精度时，最好采用较为复杂的能够反映土体各向异性屈服特性的模型，如ANIS-MCC模型。
- 弹塑性 /
- 各向异性 /
- 路基 /
- 固结 /
- 有限元
Abstract: Through the finite element analysis of an imaginary embankment under fast loading, in order to examine the difference of consolidation deformation results predicted by the three plastic-models(MCC, 3DMCC, and ANIS-MCC).The research results showed that the variation trendency of the deformation and pore pressure were mainly the same before the destroy of the embankment, however, when it necessicary, especially to improve the prediction accuracy of the ground deformation at foot, it was best to use the more complex model that could reflact the anisotropic yield characteristics of the soil, such as ANIS-MCC.
- elastic-plastic /
- anisotropy /
- subgrade /
- consolidation /
- FEM

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[2] Roscoe K H, Burlad J B.On the Generalized Stress-Strain?Behaviour of Wet Clay.Engineering Plasticity [ M ].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1968:535－609.

Roscoe K H, Schofield A N, Thurairajah A.Yield of Clays in?States Wetter Than Critical[J].Geotechnique,1963,13(3):211－240.

[3] 高彦斌.软土各向异性弹塑－黏弹塑性模型及其工程应用[D].上海:同济大学,2004.

[4] 刘元雪,施建勇.基于应力空间变换的修正剑桥模型改进[J].岩土力学,2003(1).

[5] 高彦斌,徐超,汤竞.一个考虑土的各向异性的孔压公式及其应用[J].岩土力学,2005,26(9):1349－1355.

[6] Dafalias Y F.An Anisotropic Critical State Soil Plasticity Model [J].Mechanics Research Communications,1986,13(6):341－347.

[7] Sekiguchi H, Ohta H.Introduced Anisotropy and Time?Dependency in Clays, Constitutive Equations of Soils [C]// Procedings of Specialty Session 9,9th ICSMFE.1977:229－238.

[8] Wheeler J, Naatanen A, Karstunen M, et al.An Anisotropic?Elastoplastic Model for Soft Clays[J].Canadian Geotechnical?Journal,2003,40:403－418.

[9] Baudet B, Stallerbrass S.A Constitutive Model for Structured?Clays[J].Geotechnique,2004,54(4):269－278.

[10] Liu M D, Carter J P.A Structured Cam Clay Model [J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2002,39(6):1313－1332.

[11] Zhang Liming.Settlement Patterns of Soft Foundation Under?Embankments[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1999,36:774－781.

[12] 金宗川,顾国荣,韩黎明,等.大面积堆载作用下软土地基变形特性[J].岩石力学与工程学,2005,24(6):1056－1060.

[13] Zdravkovic L, Potts D M, Hight D W.The Effect of Strength?Anisotropy on the Behavior of Embankments on Soft Ground[J].Geotechnique,2002,52:447－457.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计