地震作用下侧移验算对比及弹塑性侧移计算公式(1)

童根树; 周卫东; 张磊

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

地震作用下侧移验算对比及弹塑性侧移计算公式(1)

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029

1.
1. 浙江大学高性能材料与结构研究所,杭州 310058;
2.
2. 华汇工程设计集团股份有限公司,浙江绍兴 312000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51078328)

详细信息

作者简介:
第一作者：童根树, 男, 1963年出生, 教授?电子信箱：tonggs@zu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TU352.11
计量
- 文章访问数: 145
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 126
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-01-10
- 刊出日期: 2013-04-20

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)

1.
1. Institute of High Performance Macterial and Structure,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;
2.
2. Huahui Engineering Design Group,Shaoxing 312000,China?

摘要

摘要: 中日欧美4个国家和地区的规范和设计建议中对地震作用下侧移的验算规定进行总结，经比较发现，各国的规定有4个不同层次的侧移验算，分别是：重现期为8～95年的使用极限状态验算、地震作用标准值、设防烈度地震和罕遇地震下的侧移验算四种，各国之间差别非常大，限制侧移出发点有：不影响设备的使用、限制围护材料的破坏、限制混凝土构件开裂和设防烈度地震或罕遇地震下不倒等等，其中，中国的最为严格，罕遇地震下侧移验算只有中国才要求。
- 侧移 /
- 抗震设计 /
- 使用极限状态 /
- 规范
Abstract: Comparison of drift limitations in codes and their recommendations for seismic design of building structures in China, Japan, Europe and USA was carried out.It is found through the comparison that there are drift limitations of four levels: the serviceability requirement of the return period of 8~95 years, design seismic action level, medium and strong earthquake level.The design philosophies in different codes have great differences, these are avoiding interfering the use of facilities, confining the damage to the partition wall, avoiding crack in concrete members and life save in medium and/or strong earthquake.China has the stringent requirements for the reinforced concrete structures.
- drifts /
- seismic design /
- serviceability limit state /
- code ?

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[2] International Code Council. Uniform Building Code 1997[S]. California: International Conference of Building Officials,1997.

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S]. Brussels: CEN,2003.

[3] Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of California. SEAOC Blue Book, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary[S]. Sacramento, California: SEAOC ,1996.

[4] Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450(NEHRP ). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions[S]. Washington, D C : Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences,2003.

[5] 日本建筑中心.建筑物的构造规定-建筑基准法施行令第3章的解说与运用[M].日本建设省建筑研究所,1997.

[6] 日本建筑学会.钢构造限界状态设计指针同解说[M].2002.

[7] 日本建筑学会.铁筋混凝土造建物的韧性保证型耐震设计指针同解说[M].2002.

[8] GB 500112001建筑抗震设计规范[S].

[9] CECS 160∶2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S].

[10] Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.

[11] Tong Genshu, Huang Jinqiao. Seismic Force Modification Factor for Ductile Structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2005,16 A(8):813-825.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计