COMPARATIVE TEST RESEARCH ON UPLIFT PILE AND COMPRESSIVE PILE IN LOESS GROUND
-
摘要: 通过对4根相同桩长、桩径、位于同一场地的灌注桩在竖向的拔力和压力作用下的对比试验,研究分析黄土地基中的抗拔桩和抗压桩的承载能力和位移特性,并对抗拔桩桩周地表的变形进行分析。结果表明,在相同的桩顶荷载作用下,抗拔桩桩顶上拔量大于抗压桩桩顶沉降量,当抗拔桩的上拔荷载大于1 100 kN后,侧阻力迅速退化。随着荷载的增加,抗拔桩上部侧摩阻力变化较小,而在桩身下部,侧阻增长较快。抗拔桩在2 900 kN的上拔荷载下,在距试桩中心3.667倍桩径处,地表仍有0.2 mm的隆起变形。Abstract: Based on the vertical-compressive load and uplift load test of four bored piles with same diameter and length in the same ground,the bearing capacity and displacement behavior of uplift piles and compressive piles in loess ground were discussed.The results indicated that the displacement of the uplift piles was large than that of the compressive piles.The lateral friction was weakened rapidly when the uplift load was large than 1 100 kN.The lateral friction on the upside of compressie pile rarely changed while that of the lower part increased rapidly.There was still deformation of 0. 2 mm on the ground at the place 3. 667 times pile's diameter away from the pile axis when the uplift load reached 2 900 kN.
-
Key words:
- uplift pile /
- compressive pile /
- loess ground /
- lateral friction
-
陈小强,赵春风,甘爱明.成层土中抗拔桩与抗压桩的模型试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2009,15 (S2 ): 1537 -1541. [2] 杜广印,黄锋,李广信.抗压桩与抗拔桩侧阻的研究[J].工程地质学报,2000,8(1): 91-93. [3] 陈岳林.超长大直径钻孔灌注桩抗拔与抗压对比试验研究[J].建筑结构,2007,37(11): 52-55. [4] 张忠苗,吴庆勇,张广兴.抗拔桩和抗压桩受力性状异同性研究[J].工程勘察,2006(6): 4-9. [5] JGJ 1062003 建筑基桩检测技术规范[S].
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 75
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0