考虑盾构隧道埋深影响和岩土特性影响的地表变形计算

赵宏华; 陈国兴

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201012016

考虑盾构隧道埋深影响和岩土特性影响的地表变形计算

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201012016

1.
南京工业大学岩土工程研究所,南京210009

基金项目:

江苏省六大人才高峰计划(06-F-008)

详细信息

作者简介:
赵宏华，男，1976年出生，博士，讲师。E－mail:zhh76323@163.com

中图分类号: U456.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 87
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2010-06-25
- 刊出日期: 2010-12-20

CALCULATION METHOD OF GROUND SURFACE DEFORMATION CONSIDERING INFLUENCES OF SHIELD TUNNEL DEPTH AND ROCK-SOIL CHARACTERISTICS

1.
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering,Nanjing University of Technology,Nanjing 210009,China

摘要

摘要: 盾构施工引起地层变形的众多计算方法中，随机介质理论法和Peck法是我国应用较为广泛的两种实用方法，但这两种方法的计算参数均不太容易确定。根据46例工程实测资料，绘制出地表最大沉降与隧道相对埋深的关系图。结果表明:当盾构隧道相对埋深小于5时，盾构施工引起的地表最大沉降值变化较大;当盾构隧道相对埋深大于5时，其对地表最大沉降的影响较小。对于大部分浅埋城市地铁隧道而言，应该考虑盾构隧道相对埋深对地层变形的影响。基于盾构施工引起地层移动不均匀模型的地表最大沉降计算式，依据随机介质理论法和Peck法，推导出考虑土质软硬、隧道半径和埋深影响的地层变形实用计算方法，并通过对5个工程实例的分析，验证此计算方法的合理性。
- 盾构施工 /
- 计算方法 /
- 地层变形 /
- 地层移动模型 /
- 隧道相对埋深
Abstract: Peck method and Stochastic Medium Model(SMM) were widely used for predicting ground movement induced by shield tunneling in China.But it is difficult to determine the parameters of this two methods.So the relation between tunnel relative depth and maximum surface settlement was plotted according to 46 measured engineering cases.It shows that ground settlements induced by shield tunneling change greatly when tunnel relative depths are less than 5;influence of tunnel relative depth is little when it is greater than 5.Based on the maximum surface settlement calculating formula of soil non-uniform convergence model,and according to Peck and SMM method,an applied calculation method was deduced,which considered the influence of all different soil conditions,tunnel radius and depth,whose rationality was validated by the analysis of 5 engineering cases.
- shield construction /
- calculating method /
- ground deformation /
- soil convergence model /
- relative depth of tunnel

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

Peck R B.Deep Excavations and Tunneling in Soft Ground[C]∥Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanicsand Foundation Engineering.Mexico City:1969:225-290.

[2] Mair R J.Ground Movement Around Shallow Tunnels in Soft Clay[C]∥10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.Stolkhom:323-328.

[3] Gunn M J.The Prediction of Surface Settlement Profiles due to Tunneling,Predictive Soil Mechanics[C]∥Proc of the Wroth Memorial Symposium.Eds.Houlsby G T,Schofield A N.Oxford:1993:873-878.

[4] Rowe P K.Lee K M.An Evaluation of Simplified Techniques forEstimating Three-Dimensional Undrained Ground Movement due toTunneling in Soft Soil[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1992,29:39-52.

[5] Verruijt A,Booker J R.Surface Settlements due to Deformation of aTunnel in an Elastic Half Plane[J].Geotechnique,1996,46(4）:753-756.

[6] Sagas E C.Analysis of Undrained Soil Deformation Due toGroundloss[J].Geotechnique,1987,37(3):301-320.

[7] 魏纲.盾构施工中土体损失引起的地面沉降预测[J].岩土力学,2007,28(11):2375-2379.

[8] 魏纲.盾构法隧道统一土体移动模型的建立[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(4): 554-559.

[9] 魏纲,刘加湾.盾构法隧道统一土体移动模型参数取值研究[J].铁道建筑,2009(2):48-51.

[10] 魏纲.盾构法隧道施工引起的土体变形预测[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(2): 418-424.

[11] 阳军生,刘宝琛.挤压式盾构隧道施工引起的地表移动及变形[J].岩土力学,1998,19(3):10-13.

[12] 阳军生,刘宝琛.城市隧道施工引起的地表移动及变形[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2002.

[13] 韩煊,李宁.隧道施工引起地层位移预测模型的对比分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(3):594-600.

[14] Knothe S.Observations of Surface Movements Under Influence ofMining and Their Theoretical Interpretation[C]/ /Proceedings ofEuropean Conference on Ground Movement.Leeds,UK:Universityof Leeds,1957:210-218.

[15] 璩继立,许英姿.盾构施工引起的地表横向沉降槽分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(2):313-322.

[16] 章昕,李俊才.南京软土地区隧道盾构法施工引起的横向地表变形计算方法[J].南京工业大学学报,2008,30(2):64-68.

[17] Loganathan N,Poulos H G.Analytical Prediction for Tunneling －Induced Ground Movement in Clays [J].Journal of Geotechnicaland Geoenvironmental Engineering,1998,124(9):846-856.

[18] 乔世范,殷建华.圆形断面隧道开挖引起的地表及岩土体的位移和变形计算研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增刊):3611-3617.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计