COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOFT SOIL LAYER ON SITE CLASSIFICATION BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB 50011—2001 AND EUROCODE 8
-
摘要: 针对场地中存在软弱土层的多种情况,对中、欧场地划分的差异进行比较。通过对一般场地、20 m深度范围内含软弱夹层场地、20 m深度以下含软弱土层场地的剪切波速的计算,依据中国设计规范GB500112001、欧洲设计规范Eurocode 8分别进行场地划分。通过比较分析发现,Eurocode 8的场地分类对20 m深度范围内软弱夹层厚度的反应比GB 500112001更敏感,对20 m深度以下软弱土层厚度的考虑比GB 500112001更细致,建议中国抗震规范应进一步考虑软弱土层的影响,且将计算深度由20 m进一步向下延伸。Abstract: For several sites with soft soil layer,the difference of site classification between Chinese code GB 500112001 and European code Eurocode 8 is studied in this paper.Firstly,the shear wave velocity of ordinary site,site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth,site with soft soil layer below 20 m depth is computed,and the site classification is classified according to GB 500112001 and Eurocode 8 respectively.Then,the comparative analysis is carried out,it is found that the thickness of soft soil layer is more vulnerable to change site classification of Eurocode 8 than that of GB 500112001 for site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth,which is considered more carefully in Eurocode 8 for site with soft soil layer below 20 m depth.It is suggested that the influence of soft soil layer should be further considered in China code,and the calculation depth should be further extended from 20 m.
-
Key words:
- seismic design /
- soft soil layer /
- site classification /
- comparison
-
[2] 郭明珠,陈厚群.场地类别划分与抗震设计反应谱的讨论[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):108-111. 薄景山,翟庆生,刘红帅,等.场地分类及其在我国的演变[J].自然灾害学报,2004,13(3):44-49. [3] 薄景山,李秀领,李山有.场地条件对地震动影响研究的若干进展[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):11-15. [4] 罗开海.建筑抗震设防标准和性能设计方法研究)))中美欧抗震设计规范比较分析[D].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2005. [5] GB 50011)2001建筑抗震设计规范[S]. [6] CEN /TC 250. Eurocode 8,Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S].
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 120
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 58
- 被引次数: 0