EFFECTS OF LAYOUT OF BRACING ON LATERAL STIFFNESS OF STEEL FRAMES
-
摘要: 纯钢框架建筑结构体系刚度较小,层间位移起主要控制作用,设置支撑体系可有效地提高结构的整体抗侧刚度,减少结构用钢量。以广泛应用的多高层钢框架支撑结构为对象,通过计算不同支撑类型及支撑布置方式下钢框架支撑结构的顶点位移,研究了支撑形式对多、高层钢框架结构抗侧刚度的影响。研究结果表明,对于不同的支撑类型,支撑沿竖向集中布置于中间跨的钢框架结构抗侧移刚度好于将支撑布置在边跨以及其他跨上。对于相同的支撑布置方式,不论是中心支撑,还是偏心支撑,在抗侧刚度和经济性方面,人字形支撑框架均好于单斜杆支撑框架。Abstract: Since its low lateral stiffness, the inter-storey drifts of an un-braced stee-l frame building usually become key factors in structural design. Adding bracing to the structure is an effective measure which can improve the overall lateral stiffness and decrease the stee-l consumption. The mult-i storey and high-rise braced stee-l frames are taken as an object, through calculating the top displacements of the stee-l frames braced by different types and layouts of bracing, it studied the influence of bracing kinds on the lateral stiffness of the mult-i storey and high-rise braced stee-l frames. The results shows that, for different kinds of bracing, the lateral stiffness of a steel frame with bracings on middle spans is higher than that on side spans or other spans; for the same layouts of bracing, either centrically braced frame, or eccentrically braced frame, in the facets of lateral stiffness and economy, herringbone braced frame is better than single sway rod braced frame.
-
Key words:
- steel-frame structure /
- lateral stiffness /
- types of bracing /
- layout pattern /
- top displacement
-
[2] 黄 怡, 王元清, 石永久. 支撑布置方式对多高层钢结构抗震性能的影响分析. 钢结构, 2005, 20(5) : 41-44 沈国庆, 陈 宏, 王元清, 等. 支撑形式对钢框架结构抗震性能影响. 低温建筑技术, 2005(6) : 37-40 [3] 陈富生, 邱国桦, 范 重. 高层建筑钢结构设计. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004 [4] JGJ 99-98 高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程 [5] 申 林, 蔡益燕, 郁银泉. 偏心支撑钢框架设计方法. 建筑结构,2002, 32(2) : 13-16 [6] 周学军, 陈 鲁, 曲 慧. 多、高层钢结构支撑的布置方式对框架侧向刚度的影响. 钢结构, 2003, 18(4) : 51-54 [7] 赵宝成, 顾 强. 偏心支撑钢框架在循环荷载作用下非线性有限元分析. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(2) : 27-31
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 76
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 147
- 被引次数: 0