DISCUSSION ON INFLUENCE DEPTH OF LARGE-SCALE LOAD IN URBAN CONSTRUCTION
-
摘要: 随着工程建设规模的扩大,围海造地、码头堆场、堆载预压等填方工程的面积越来越大,它们都属于大面积荷载问题。在城市建设中,建筑物荷载的累加效应也具有大面积荷载的性质。通过对城市工程建设与大面积荷载关系的揭示,对大面积荷载的特征及其对地面沉降的影响进行初步定义和分析。大面积荷载对变形的影响深度大于一般建筑物的影响深度,但小于按常规方法计算得到的结果。在对发生这种情况的可能原因分析的基础上,对人们所发现的上海地区城市建设与沉降的关系,如建筑密度越大,建筑容积率越高,地面沉降越显著,新区建设较旧城改造沉降效应明显等,给予较好的解释。同时得出,容积率一定的情况下,高层建筑由于密度小,间距大,将会比密集的多层建筑更有利于减小整体地面沉降等结论。有关分析对城市建设规划会有所帮助。Abstract: With the development of construction,such engineering activities as beach reclamation,ore stacking and preloading act are becoming much bigger than before.They will bring large-scale load and related problems.It is the same with the buildings in cities,which also has the characteristics of load with large-scale.It was investigated the relationship between city buildings and large-scale equivalent effecting load,and discussed primarily its effect on land subsidence.The influence depth of large-scale load is bigger than routine building load,but is smaller than the one calculated by routine methods,whose reason is interpreted.It is found that land subsidence is related to city construction in Shanghai.Bigger subsidence is induced in new area construction than old inhabited area,and bigger building density and bigger volumetric fraction caused bigger subsidence.These phenomena can be well understood according to the paper.As a result,the conclusion is drawn that with smaller density and bigger spacing,a highrise building will be more useful in reducing land subsidence than a low-rise building,which is thought to be helpful for urban planning.
-
[2] 金宗川,顾国荣,韩黎明.大面积堆载作用下软土地基变形的几点认识//《第二届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集》编辑委员会.第二届全国岩土与工程学术大会论文集(下册).北京:科学出版社,2006:685-689 金宗川,顾国荣,韩黎明,等.大面积堆载作用下软土地基变形特性.岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(6):1 056-1 060 [3] 介玉新,于立群,李广信,等.软土地基上垃圾填埋场的固结和沉降分析.工程地质学报,2006,14(增刊):532-535 [4] 龚士良.上海地面沉降现状与控制对策.上海建设科技,1996(5) [5] 龚士良.上海城市建设对地面沉降的影响.中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998(2):108-111 [6] 严学新,龚士良,曾正强,等.上海城区建筑密度与地面沉降关系分析.水文地质工程地质,2002(6):21-25 [7] 沈国平,王莉.上海城市建设与地面沉降关系初探.城市规划汇刊,2003(6):91-94 [8] 叶淑君,薛禹群,张云,等.上海区域地面沉降模型中土层变形特征研究.岩土工程学报,2005,27(2):140-147 [9] 刘杜娟.中国沿海地区地面沉降问题思考.中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(4):87-90 [10] 刘毅,张先林,万贵富,等.上海市近期地面沉降形势与对策建议.中国地质灾害与防治学报,1998,9(2):13-17 [11] 高大钊.土力学与基础工程.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998 [12] 刘全林,魏焕卫.地层沉降计算中压缩层厚度确定方法的比较.岩土工程技术,2001(4):208-211 [13] 陈仲颐,周景星,王洪瑾.土力学.北京:清华大学出版社,1994 [14] 李广信.高等土力学.北京:清华大学出版社,2004 [15] 钱家欢,殷宗泽.土工原理与计算.第二版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,1996 [16] 杜秦文.土体剪切模量随深度连续变化非均质地基解析研究:[博士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,2005 [17] 何开胜,沈珠江.天然沉积黏土的结构性调查.东南大学学报,2002,32(5):818-822 [18] Burland J B.On the Compressibility and Shear Strength of Natural Clays.Geotechnique,1990,40(3):327-378 [19] 沈珠江.软土工程特性和软土地基设计.岩土工程学报,1998,20(1)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 80
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 94
- 被引次数: 0